The phrase "extremely insignificant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to emphasize the minimal importance or relevance of something.
Example: "The changes made to the report were extremely insignificant and did not affect the overall outcome."
Alternatives: "highly trivial" or "utterly unimportant."
Mr Putin, who has dismissed Politkovskaya's work as "extremely insignificant" has not met any of her family and did not say anything about her murder until two days after her death.
Mr. Putin attempted to belittle Ms. Politkovskaya after her death, saying her reporting was "extremely insignificant for political life in Russia". He was wrong about that; she was as fearless as any reporter of her generation.
The inspector general recommends that the department review the list and determine which of the "extremely insignificant" assets that have been included should remain and provide better guidance to states on what to submit in the future.
President Vladimir Putin, in the days after the murder, said that Ms Politkovskaya's "ability to influence political life in Russia was extremely insignificant", and that her death caused Russia's reputation more harm than her articles.
Mr. Putin's chilly response to her death — he was silent for days, then remarked that "her influence on political life was extremely insignificant in scale" — colored his image in the West.
Shortly after Ms Politkovskaya's death, President Vladimir Putin, in an attempt to show that the state had no motive to carry out the murder, dismissed her work as "extremely insignificant" and said Russia's image was harmed more by her murder than by her work.
The number of troops deployed in Africa is extremely small, even insignificant, in the broader context of the massive Chinese military.
The capsaicin of spicy food and the caffeine of green tea have certainly shown promise in spiking your metabolism, but the effects may be extremely short-lived, statistically insignificant, and only mildly helpful to people already in good shape.
For instance, the correlation between Acer and Zelkova ENT distances and the corresponding morphological distances was extremely low and mostly insignificant, whereas Fagus ENT distances significantly correlated with morphology (see Additional file 2).
However, regression result of age is statistically insignificant but this insignificance level is extremely meager that it can be used for some valuable policy recommendations.
For example, an extremely hazardous chemical associated with insignificant exposure probably would not require regulation while a mildly hazardous chemical with widespread and pervasive exposure probably would.
