The phrase "extraneous influence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an influence that is unnecessary or irrelevant to a particular situation or context.
Example: "The study aimed to eliminate any extraneous influence that could skew the results."
Alternatives: "unnecessary influence" or "irrelevant influence."
"Ms. Hobson's interview makes unmistakably clear that the verdict was based entirely on the evidence, not any extraneous influence," they wrote.
Sample sites would have to be close to likely final barriers, to avoid extraneous influence, and within modern zones of ACC influence, ideally would form a depth transect, and would have continuous, mixed terrigenous and biogenic sections.
All the independent variables, including survey year, were further subjected to multivariate analysis, using a pooled dataset for each year examined to identify the significant determinants of acceptance of wife-beating while controlling for the extraneous influence of the survey years.
On the one hand, it may be reduced introspective accessibility of the constructs in question: having no insight into their feelings and biases the respondents produced low scores are no reflection of their actual doping-related cognition, but instead represent an extraneous influence, such as generic social desirability.
Even earlier, Russian folk art was subject to extraneous influences in a way not typical elsewhere: in the 17th century, craftsmen were requisitioned from many parts of Russia to supply products for the national economy or to work on palaces, and they were also assembled around monasteries for prescribed output.
To remove extraneous influences, we first apply a state-space model that was developed for detecting coseismic changes of groundwater levels (Kitagawa and Matsumoto, 1996; Matsumoto et al., 2003) to the strain data recorded at KMU.
Strategies to avoid extraneous influences on decision making 84 would also be worthwhile.
Allowing for potential effects of various extraneous influences, such as protocol adherence, 200 participants per group will be required (total n = 400).
Our framework also facilitates the separation of the extraneous influences from the binding signal, and even helps to account for correlations between the influences themselves which can often create false impressions of biological relationships between unrelated datasets.
Intrinsic characteristics of organizations, such as size, type of leadership and organizational culture make organizations more or less responsive and in some extreme cases, even resistant to extraneous influences leading eventually to a form of inertia [ 15, 21].
We include an additional 20% (N = 18 per group) to allow for attrition and potential effects of various extraneous influences, such as protocol adherence; 106 participants per group will be required (total = 212).
