external review

USAGE SUMMARY

"external review" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You could use it to refer to the process of having an outside person or organization evaluate the performance, value, or impact of an individual or organization. For example: "Our organization has decided to undergo an external review to assess our effectiveness."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We encourage a lot of external review," he said.

The New York Times - Science

He outlined details of the external review of Q&A.

The Guardian

appeals in 1999 -- the first step before external review.

The New York Times

Will external review undermine the ability of health plans to steer patients to cost-effective care?

The New York Times

External review will become a big idea in constant need of adjustment.

The New York Times

They do not and cannot address external review such as lawsuits.

The New York Times

An external review rated the programme as 'amber' in July 2011.

The Guardian

The new rules do not address the issue of external review.

The New York Times

"I'd like to think that's partly because of the external review process, which gives patients a sense of assurance".

The New York Times

"Clearly, given the history involved and the lack of attention paid in the past, an external review is necessary".

The New York Times

It added: "Our consideration of the case included an external review by a queen's counsel, which was concluded early 2013.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a review conducted by an external party, ensure that you clearly define the scope and objectives of the "external review" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that an "external review" covers all aspects of an organization or process. Clearly define the specific areas under review and communicate this scope to all stakeholders.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "external review" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig shows that it typically refers to the act or process of an evaluation or assessment conducted by an independent party.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "external review" is a commonly used noun phrase that refers to an evaluation or assessment conducted by an independent, outside entity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various fields, particularly in news, science, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define the scope of the review and its objectives. Alternatives such as "independent assessment" or "outside audit" can be used depending on the context. It is a valuable term for conveying objectivity and credibility in evaluation processes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

external evaluation

A broader term encompassing various forms of external assessment.

independent assessment

Emphasizes the impartiality and autonomy of the evaluation process.

outside audit

Suggests a formal inspection or examination conducted by an external entity.

third-party evaluation

Highlights the involvement of an uninvolved party in the assessment.

external audit

Focuses on a systematic examination by an external body.

independent examination

Highlights the impartial and thorough investigation aspect.

objective appraisal

Stresses the unbiased and fair nature of the evaluation.

independent verification

Focuses on confirming the accuracy or truth through external means.

peer review

Highlights evaluation by individuals within the same field.

external scrutiny

Emphasizes a detailed and critical examination by an external source.

FAQs

How is an "external review" different from an internal one?

An "external review" involves individuals or entities outside the organization, offering an unbiased perspective, while an internal review is conducted by members within the organization.

What are the benefits of conducting an "external review"?

An "external review" provides fresh insights, identifies potential biases, and offers objective recommendations for improvement. It can also enhance credibility and transparency.

What can I say instead of "external review"?

You can use alternatives like "independent assessment", "outside audit", or "third-party evaluation" depending on the context.

When is an "external review" necessary?

An "external review" is often necessary when objectivity is crucial, such as in cases of potential conflicts of interest, significant organizational changes, or when seeking accreditation or benchmarking.