Sentence examples for external quality evaluation from inspiring English sources
The EEB was responsible for external quality evaluation of the project with respect to scientific relevance (new knowledge, evidence base and validated content), patient relevance (all relevant contributors to impact of headache), ethical aspects (ensuring ethics approvals where needed) and dissemination.
We also determined whether the accuracy of algorithms developed for within-hospital surveillance differs from those meant for external quality evaluation.
External quality controls included evaluation of laboratory and clinical testing by participating in CAP College of American Pathologistt) [ 49], and KSLM (The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine) [ 50].
A distinction was made between algorithms aimed at supporting within-hospital surveillance either in isolation or in combination with other indicators and those developed as a means of external quality of care evaluation.
In a full quality evaluation, external expert reviews would check additional quality indicators relating to treatment in each centre by retrospective examination of the records [8].
External quality assessment as well as on-site evaluation of methods and procedures was done at each peripheral health facility laboratory level.
The quality of field work, data collection, evaluation, and chemical, biological and physical analyses was successfully evaluated by internal and external quality assurance.
Programs for Accreditation of clinical laboratories consider participation in External Quality Assessment Schemes (EQAS) a key element in the evaluation of testing procedures and improving them.
External quality assessment programs allow intercomparison within laboratories, detection of errors, and evaluation of the suitability of some reagents or diagnostic kits for the purpose for which they were designed; these activities are also useful for continuous education.
The quality evaluation took into consideration the studies' internal and external validity.
Cohen's kappa between the two investigators for quality evaluation was 0.750 (standard error: 2.100) for reporting, which is substantial, and 1 (standard error: 0.000) for external validity, internal validity and power, which is perfect.
