"external coercion" is a perfectly valid phrase that can be used in written English.
It typically refers to the application of outside forces, such as laws or regulations, that compel or restrict an individual or group. For example, "The police are using external coercion to control anti-government protests."
It is to acknowledge the imperfect nature of our own socio-economic and political arrangements, in which missile silos have long co-existed invisibly with mailboxes, and the writer, however free of external coercion, is not always ready or willing to interrogate his own relationship with power.
(2) Such diversity also entails that, to the extent that it is practicable, it cannot occur voluntarily but only through external coercion.
The ideal guidelines for public reasoning would ensure that the discussion is inclusive, public, and free from any internal or external coercion, that anyone may raise a point that they believe is relevant to the topic at hand, that any participant is allowed to challenge the rules for agenda setting, and that discussion continues until a consensus is reached (Habermas 1996, 304 305).
External coercion did not harm treatment outcome.
In contrast, controlled motivation in the healthcare domain typically involves patient engagement in treatment due to external pressure, coercion, or feelings of guilt.
Regardless of the external pressure or coercion, the soul cannot be rushed.
The tenure system developed to maintain academics free of external pressure and coercion, and in dramatic instances tenure has been used to defend academic freedom.
Physicians according to the autonomy principle thus respect a patient with adequate capacities and conditions (i.e., maturity and freedom from external or internal coercion) to make decisions and respond with responsibility to their effects.
Patients feel autonomous when they regulate their behaviour volitionally, rather than because of external pressure or coercion; feel competent when they are informed, capable and effective in achieving desired outcomes and feel a sense of relatedness or connection with others when they feel respected, understood and cared for.
The defining trait of this liberalism is a will to be liberated from the coercion of external controls and a consequent concern with inner motivation.
According to SDT, autonomous motivation is characterised by self-endorsement of the behaviour and a belief in its value while controlled motivation typically relates to engaging in a behaviour due to feelings of guilt or external pressures such as coercion.
