Sentence examples for extensive flaws from inspiring English sources

Overall, the majority of reviews had extensive flaws, and only 31010%) had minimal flaws.

Scores on this instrument can vary from 1 (extensive flaws) to 7 (minimal flaws).

Based on these nine criteria, the reviewer must give a rating score on a grading scale from one, reflecting extensive flaws, to seven, reflecting minimal flaws.

A total of 43 (30.9%) reports had minimal or minor flaws as shown by an overall score of ≥ 5, and 96 (69.1%) reports had major or extensive flaws, scoring ≤ 4 on the overall quality summary score.

Ten out of the twelve reviews described in this meta-review scored in the low or middle ranges of the Quality Assessment Checklist for Reviews, which indicates "major" or "extensive" flaws (see Additional file 2).

The overall scores on this checklist range from "extensive flaws" (score 1 or 2), to "major flaws" (score 3 or 4), "minor flaws" (score 5 or 6) and "minimal flaws" (score 7).

A systematic review of TMJD diagnosis[ 34], which was carried out more than 10 years ago, reported major to extensive methodologic flaws in 40% of the analyzed studies.

The other ten reviews scored in the lowest of middle ranges, indicating "extensive" or "major" flaws.

This implies a high likelihood of "extensive" or "major" flaws in the results and conclusions.

All these reviews received a methodological score of 4.5 or lower, indicating a high chance of "extensive" or "major" flaws.

Jadad found that Cochrane reviews had greater methodological rigor, more frequent updates and higher overall quality scores than those published in peer-reviewed paper journals, though both types were found to contain extensive and serious flaws.