Sentence examples for expressive measures from inspiring English sources

When compared to such potential measures, the use of expressive measures that fail to impose any concrete impositions on individuals, and which one is, in theory, simply able to ignore may be considered as representing the type pf measure with the least effect on individual liberty possible, even where they are in certain circumstances capable of brining about certain unintended effects.

In some cases, however, the reversed associations were found to be consistent across traits or SNPs (e.g. KIAA0319 rs761100 and rs6935076 and expressive language measures).

Four additional participants were eliminated due to inconsistent behavioral report, or because their behavioral scores did not correlate with an expressive performance measure, as described in detail below.

Cognitive development was assessed, using the Naming Vocabulary instrument from the British Ability Scales II (BAS-NV), which measures expressive language ability (Elliott et al., 1997).

The EVT-2, measuring expressive English language development, was selected for its validity and reliability as a measure of the development of expressive oral language and appeal to young children, as well.

Participant responses to the Expressive Behaviours were measured using an ad hoc scale of 6 Likert questions intended to measure the following: Saliency—How clear was it that the robot was signalling something?

Although we found no differences in the discourse-based measure of expressive vocabulary, the picture-naming measure used by Yan and Nicoladis, in spite of being an experimental task, resembles a standardized test in its administration and structure.

This may be due to the Pervasive Anger Scale only measuring expressive forms of anger.

Only a small number of studies (n = 2) utilized expressive tasks to measure Chinese vocabulary, and so we only used receptive Chinese scores in the following analysis.

The Norwegian version of the 'Grammatic Closure' subtest from the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA; Kirk, McCarthy & Kirk, 1968) was used to measure expressive grammatical knowledge.

That is, we examined younger children's receptive (expressive not formally measured) vocabulary scores and found them to be lower in comparison with monolingual peers.