Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
PANSS scores of FEP patients on Depressed factor correlated positively with the accuracy to recognize fearful expressions (r = .473).473
The focus is on rational expressions r= r(x) which are "matrix convex" near 0; i.e., those rational expressions r for which there is an ϵ>0 such that if X="(X1,…,Xg) is a g-tuple of n×n symmetric matrices satisfyingϵIn− X21+⋯+X2g)is positive definite and Y is also, then the symmetric matrixtr(X)+(1−t)r(Y)−r tX+ 1−t Y is positive semidefinite for all numbers t, 0⩽t⩽1.
STEP 2: Having converted names for the terms into algebraic terms, one then converts the propositions into equations using the following: STEP 5: (ELIMINATION) [LT (p. 101) ] Then one can write r as r x1, …, xj, y1, …, yk). 1. form all possible expressions r(a1, …, aj, y1, …, yk) where a1, …, aj are each either 0 or 1, then 2. multiply all of these expressions together to obtain s y1, …, yk).
Spearman rank correlation test showed a significant correlation between sFas levels and VEGF expressions (R = 0.882, P < 0.05).
TaqMan qPCR of 424 RCC-related genes correlated highly with FFPE RNA-seq expressions (r = 0.775 for FFPE tumor 1, r = 0.803 for FFPE tumor 2).
On the other hand, the AFAP1L2 gene expression patterns were random (Fig. S1E), and there were no significant correlations between AFAP1L1 and AFAP1L2 gene expressions (r = 0.122, Fig. S1F).
Similar(51)
Proof Firstly, notice that R ( n ) statistic has an equivalent expression R ( n ) = max 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n | S j − S i − j − i n S n | (3.15).
Increased bFGF expression was more frequently found in tumors with low VEGF expression (r = —0.286; P = 0.095).
In the third instar wing disc the Ato-3.6BB-GFP had no expression (R).
Circulating IL-6 levels were positively correlated with intra-tumor IL-6 expression (r = 0.85, P < 0.01).
When X = Spec ( R ) for some object R of k - a l g, we use the expression R -group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com