Nitta et al. pointed out that for legal reasoning a sort-hierarchy (or a sorted term) is not sufficient to describe structural knowledge for event assertions, which express facts caused at some particular time and place.
The sentences expressing these epistemic relations express facts — call them epistemic support facts.
Suppose, for example, that we want to express facts about the arithmetic of the natural numbers.
DSLs allow to express facts in the idiom and at the level of abstraction of the problem domain.
In 2000, the Open Mind Common Sense (OMCS) project [34] was launched with the aim of collecting from the Internet and from volunteer collaborators sentences expressing facts of ordinary life.
This know-how corresponds functionally to propositional knowledge, in that it will typically be expressed in statements of the form "A is B"—such as "oxen are animals"—which by our lights express facts or true propositions.
That is, we want to express facts about the structure (N; 0, S, <, +, ×) consisting of the set N = {0, 1,...} of natural numbers, together with the common arithmetical operations and relations.
The completed representations might either express facts to be remembered, or might themselves be executable commands, such as formal queries to a database or high-level instructions placing one block on another in a robot's (simulated or real) world.
In order to identify proteins that interact with FACT-L, immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments using gametocyte extracts from transgenic parasites expressing FACT-l::c-Myc were performed.
Using this notation, sentences of provability logic express facts about provability.
