Sentence examples for express justice from inspiring English sources

There was an even greater fuss when he told senators he had only written it to express Justice Jackson's own views, a claim fiercely challenged by other lawyers who had worked closely with the judge.

"No statue which has had its face removed can express justice or law or illumination or mercy," the poet Peter Levi wrote in 1970, "but there is a disturbing presence about these two giants that does express something".

Several justices expressed skepticism: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, for example, questioned whether the courts were being asked to intervene in an arena in which the executive branch — specifically the Environmental Protection Agency — has the requisite expertise to act.

His diplomatic representative in the US, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, sent a letter to the parole board on behalf of the pontiff asking for a commutation of Gissendaner's sentence "to one that would better express both justice and mercy".

As the justices demonstrated by their comments and questions when this case was argued on Feb. 29 -- a lively argument that proved a good predictor of the outcome today -- the answers can be quite subjective and often express the justices' own world view.

As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

There was apparent consensus on the court on only one point, expressed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Both conceptions may be expressed as "justice" or "order" but actually are more comprehensive.

That said, the Court's understanding of corruption is very narrow, Roberts explained, echoing a view expressed by Justice Anthony Kennedy in McConnell v. F.E.C., in 2003: "Congress may target only a specific type of corruption — 'quid pro quo' corruption".

It is firmly my hope, as it was expressed by Justice O'Connor in her decision involving the University of Michigan Law School admissions criteria, that in twenty-five yearaceace in our society won't be needed to be considered in any situation.

In a nod to an argument colorfully expressed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during the hearing, the ruling also rejects the notion that the state definition of marriage rests on the ability of couples to procreate.