Exact(1)
Barrier contraceptive trials and disease intervention studies often utilize coital diaries to measure sexual exposures: dates and frequency of intercourse, product use, additional or alternative contraceptive use, and menstrual bleeding.
Similar(59)
It is also unlikely that exposure is related to diagnosis as we only included exposures dating at least 5 years prior to the prostate cancer diagnosis.
In the case of exposures dating back at least 20 years before diagnosis, significant results were obtained only for hip/pelvic x-rays (OR 2.87 95% CI 1.47 5.62).
We looked at exposures dating at least 5 years, 10 years and 20 years before the diagnosis of prostate cancer to exclude bias from exposures related to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the disease.
We assessed exposures dating back to 1948 (when DDT was first used there) from pesticides applied for tree pests (e.g., gypsy moths), cranberry bogs, other agriculture, and mosquito control on wetlands.
When exposures dating at least 10 years and 20 years before diagnosis were considered, only hip/pelvic x-rays were associated with a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer.
The latter is now supported by 32 cosmogenic surface exposure dates from 28 tors across the whole upland.
These are among the oldest surface exposure dates yet measured on Earth, but are not however consistent with the 40Ar/39Ar chronology used to define the age of the landscape due to unconstrained levels of erosion.
Findings are consistent with prior studies with well-described HIV exposure dates,[31], [32] and support use of 14 days prior to symptom onset to estimate HIV transmission dates.
To characterize estimated date of infection in AHI subjects, we reviewed charts to elicit exposure dates with all reported sex partners and partner HIV status in the 8 weeks preceding AHI diagnosis.
For case-patients with known exposure dates, the median incubation period was 9 days (range 1 21 days).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com