Sentence examples for exposure summaries from inspiring English sources

Patient records and occupational exposure summaries were reviewed.

This has often led to reductive exposure summaries based on a compromise between pragmatic choice and subject specific etiological understanding.

There are other limitations of the analysis by Vermeulen et al. (2014): Garshick et al. (2012) employed a second measure of diesel exposure (exposure duration), which Vermeulen et al. did not account for in the analysis; and Vermeulen et al. used very crude exposure summaries (e.g., midpoints of exposure intervals).

Exposure summary.

Childhood leukemia risk was not elevated in studies of paternal farm-related pesticide exposure (summary OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 1.32) and was statistically nonsignificantly elevated in studies of nonfarm workplace exposure (summary OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 0.66 3.00) and mixed or unknown workplace exposure (summary OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.65 2.60).

In the absence of a known or even plausible biophysical mechanism on which to base an etiologically relevant exposure measure, the exposure summary used in most epidemiologic studies has been the time-weighted average field.

(3) C ˙ M = n F c ˙ F As with the length of training, the value of ċF is specific to a particular study because it varies with the amount of working time aggregated into an exposure summary variable.

The questionnaire sought information on current socio-demographic variables, environmental and occupational exposures, summary of pregnancy history, contraceptive use, TTP and pregnancy outcomes.

The association between childhood leukemia and any prenatal maternal occupational pesticide exposure was somewhat stronger in studies of farm-related exposures (summary OR = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.53 3.89) compared with studies of mixed or unknown pesticide exposure place (summary OR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17 2.81).

Inter-rater reliability of the 5 Potential and Protection ratings used to compute SBEI ratings was good to excellent, and the overall SBEI exposure prevention summary scores demonstrated the best reliability of all.

In contrast, meta-analysis results showed that negative ionization, overall, was significantly associated with lower depression ratings, with a stronger association observed at high levels of negative ion exposure (mean summary effect and 95% confidence interval (CI) following high- and low-density exposure: 14.28 (95% CI: 12.93-15.62) and 7.23 (95% CI: 2.62-11.83), respectively).