Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
In Fisher's exact test, Neckar River exposure groups and negative control were always compared pairwise.
Mobile sampling studies should estimate annual mean concentrations for exposure groups with five or more sites.
Plasma formate levels did not differ between the methanol and control exposure groups.
In withdrawal analyses, only one significant change over time varied among exposure groups.
Fig. 1 Results from hierarchical clustering analyses of genes and exposure groups after 131I and 211At exposure.
Where parameter assumptions were met, differences between exposure groups were determined using an all pairs Tukey-Kramer test.
Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05) was used to identify significant differences between exposure groups.
In comparing the exposure groups, the results indicate that the limit value ofazw(8h)=0·8 m/s2should be reviewed.
Exposure-period-related difference was found significant with prepubertal exposure groups having longer estrous cycle duration, heavier at vaginal opening and having higher serum estradiol level compared with neonatal exposure groups.
Fetal ovarian proteome analysis (2-DE gels) showed, across all exposure groups, 86 differentially expressed protein spots compared to controls.
The intracellular content of both silicon and mercury in combination group were much higher than those in single exposure groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com