Sentence examples for exposure determinations from inspiring English sources

Even conventional exposure determinations, such as ingested pesticides, are fundamentally dependent upon patterns of food consumption.

Since different vulnerabilities and sometimes different health effects manifest at different developmental stages, any exposure-only judgment will run into significant difficulties defining spatial and temporal boundaries for exposure determinations.

FQPA may further obscure exposure determinations through mandates requiring EPA to assess cumulative exposure, including all exposure routes and sources, all chemicals with similar modes of action, and other mixtures of multiple chemicals.

First, we examined the relative importance of continuous perinatal ETS exposure compared with later exposure, determinations that are essential to identify the critical periods in which the developing brain is vulnerable to adverse effects of ETS.

The surface at these sites had already been dated (using the radiocarbon technique or the surface exposure determination using in situ produced 10Be).

Mothers completed personal prenatal air monitoring for PAH exposure determination.

The very large AHS enrolled approximately 90 000 farmer applicators and their spouses but relied upon questionnaire based exposure determination.

SHS exposure determination was dependent upon responses from the questionnaire and may also be confounded by other occupational and residential exposures.

The exposure determination was largely related to questions about proximity to electrical machinery, rather than soliciting more general information about the tasks carried out.

Our data showed that seeking to reduce exposure measurement errors in individual exposure determination, assigning exposure through dermal absorption, and inhalation should be considered combined with ingestion, since TTHM through ingestion composed less than 10% of integrated internal dose.

If we arbitrarily assign sensitivity of exposure determination from omission of cordless phone use a value of 74% in cases and 78% in controls, assuming 100% specificity (in cases and controls) and an actual exposure prevalence of 54% [according to the data of Hardell et al. (2006b ], a true OR of 1.5 would be reduced to 1.2.