Sentence examples for explicitly grant that from inspiring English sources

Although it could also be interpreted to imply freedom of religion, delegates were unwilling to explicitly grant that right, knowing that it would cause an uproar in Catholic Mexico.

In other words, Mr. Shmulewitz said, since the board would likely have the power to prohibit the screening in of terraces even without being explicitly granted that power in the house rules, the letter writer's prudent clarification of the issue likely saved him -- and the co-op -- from an unpleasant and potentially expensive dispute that the co-op would almost certainly have won.

Phenomenon 6 explicitly grants that the area rule holds only approximately for the Moon, with a further remark indicating that none of the phenomena are being put forward as holding exactly.

Writing for the court, Justice Stephen G. Breyer pointed out that the Constitution did not explicitly grant Congress the power to criminalize conduct or imprison offenders, but that the necessary-and-proper clause made each possible.

The federal law that requires schools and colleges to protect the privacy of students' educational records does not explicitly grant students and their parents the right to sue for breaches of that privacy.

These attacks only require two permissions that, in case the app is installed from the Play Store, the user does not need to explicitly grant and for which she is not even notified.

I would not grant that.

If comfortable with allowing you access, he or she may explicitly grant the institution permission, waiving FERPA rights.

For some of these, you need to explicitly grant Google permission to keep track of data associated with your profile.

In the Coakley case, the judge held that that federal restrictions on funding for states that recognize same-sex marriage violates the 10th Amendment, the part of the Constitution that declares that rights not explicitly granted to the federal government, or denied to the states, belong to the states.

In the Coakley case, Judge Tauro had held that that federal restrictions on financing for states that recognize same-sex marriage violates the 10th Amendment — the part of the Constitution that declares that rights not explicitly granted to the federal government, or denied to the states, belong to the states.