Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
As MacKinnon wrote, with the anti-pornography feminist Andrea Dworkin, pornography was "the graphic sexually explicit subordination of women".
MacKinnon rather considered it hate speech, one that she and Dworkin defined as "the graphic sexually explicit subordination of women through pictures or words", but also one with real power - notably, to cause the rape and murder of women.
The ordinance defined pornography as the "sexually explicit subordination of women, graphically depicted, through pictures and/or words" (Bronstein 2011, 324).
2. Some argue that the Indianapolis Ordinance defining pornography as 'the graphic sexually explicit subordination of women whether in pictures or words' might capture and proscribe WB Yeats' 'Leda and the Swan' and Titian's 'Danae'Danae
4.Careful readers may notice that the Mac-Dworkin definition defines 'pornography' as the graphic sexually explicit subordination of women, rather than as material that depicts or causes the subordination of women.
Similar(53)
Thus many contemporary feminist definitions define "pornography" as sexually explicit material that depicts women's subordination in such a way as to endorse that subordination.
Past examples include religious support (explicit or implicit) for slavery and women's subordination.
In other terms, the flow of information within the proof is constrained by an explicit structure of contexts, ordered by a relation of subordination.
The antifemale pornography that these arguments target is sexually explicit material that portrays women as inferior or as apt for subordination or other forms of mistreatment.
Or it might turn out that non-sexually explicit advertising that depicts women in positions of sexual servility in such a way as to endorse that subordination is also bad in the relevant way.
"Pornography", in contrast, is typically defined as that subset of sexually explicit material that depicts women being coerced, abused, dominated or degraded in such a way as to endorse their subordination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com