Sentence examples for explicit stimulus from inspiring English sources

Four within-subjects factors were considered as sources of variability: Task (implicit, explicit), Stimulus (dot, human), Direction (up, down), and Velocity (slow, medium, fast), resulting in a total of 192 trials (8 replications per condition).

Our results indicate that even in the absence of explicit stimulus motion, observation of static photographs of human actions with implied motion produces a clearly greater cortical activation than observation of static images of less dynamic actions.

The unit that reaches the threshold first triggers a shift of focal-attentional processing resources to the location it represents, thereby mediating deeper and explicit stimulus analyses (e.g., feature identification) and motor response decisions.

While several functional brain imaging studies have demonstrated involvement of the STG in tasks involving explicit stimulus-centered judgments, prior rTMS studies targeting the right STG did not find the expected neglect-like rightward bias in size judgments using the conventional landmark task.

The explicit stimuli were social stimuli which are thought to be crucial for behavioral adaptations (Rolls, 2000).

As shown in Table  12, there was a significant gender difference in agreement among studies involving explicit stimuli.

Furthermore, increased salience should also increase FRN amplitudes which was not the case for the explicit stimuli.

Thus, a primary reinforcer confers motivational value to contextual background via Pavlovian conditioning, and the motivational value then "spills over" to the explicit stimuli occurring in this background.

We expected larger FRN amplitudes after negative than after positive feedback (Miltner et al., 1997), particularly for explicit stimuli (Santesso et al., 2012).

More sexually explicit stimuli elicit greater negative affect among women than among men (Laan & Everaerd, 1995a, 1995b) and women typically have less exposure to sexually explicit materials than men (Hald, 2006).

Because our data set did not include enough studies, we could not examine male sexual responses to erotic versus explicit stimuli, so our explanation for the difference in male concordance according to stimulus explicitness is only speculative.