Sentence examples for explicit grant from inspiring English sources

The British government refused an explicit grant of responsible government but did accept the proposal to unite the Canadas.

The middle man is irrelevant to whether or not business has been done between the publisher and I. Likewise, if I cut a check to the government and the government cuts a check to Raytheon, I did business with Raytheon.So then we're left with the first point: that there is an enumerated power to tax, but no explicit grant of power to make people do business with private companies.

He talked about the danger of letting "the old left's embarrassed avoidance of an explicit patriotism" grant white supremacists a monopoly on the Union Jack.As if to prove his point, Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party (BNP), went on trial two days later for his own kind of flag-waving.

The biomedical model of understanding and treating psychological problems became even more explicit in grant funding decisions.

The Constitution was explicit in granting Congress the power to set the term of copyright, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote, provided that term was a limited one.

He added, in an e-mailed statement, "The intelligence community insists that its officers not exceed the very explicit authorities granted".

The explicit power granted to the president by Article 2 of the Constitution has generally been interpreted broadly by the courts, in those rare instances where it is has been interpreted at all.

Unusually for Latin America, Chile's constitution fails to grant explicit status to its Indian minorities, although the government now plans to change that.

Defenders point out that the majority of the investigations have followed an explicit request or grant of jurisdiction from the government in the country where the crimes were allegedly committed, as in the case of Uganda.

The current wave of protests grew out of simmering resentment at the military's increasingly explicit efforts to grant itself permanent political power and privileges, including protection from civilian oversight.

Defenders say the majority of the investigations have followed an explicit request or grant of jurisdiction from the government in the country where the crimes were committed, as in the case of Uganda; while others say criticism of the institution came when it started investigating acts that had been committed by current rulers or their close associates from 2009.