Sentence examples for explicit argumentation from inspiring English sources

As noted in the second section, on what analytic feminists share with other feminist philosophers, analytic feminists value explicit argumentation and clear, literal, and precise uses of language.

This is so either because the list of relevant categories did not contain time in the first place, or because even though it was present at that point, claims for its housing change were dropped without explicit argumentation.

In light of Davidson's modesty about provability, and lack of explicit argumentation, some commentators (Child 1992; see also McDowell 1979) have suggested that mere reflection on the kinds of generalizations that we draw upon in coming to understand each other supports (but cannot prove) mental anomalism.

Such order effects could result in slight shifts in the scoring, but we expect the effect on this study to be minor because the scoring was performed by experts in their field and was accompanied by explicit argumentation.

Such implicit norms of well-formed and communicatively successful utterances are not identical with the explicit rules of argumentation.

He has been called the "founding father of the Chinese logical tradition" (Harbsmeier 1998: 286), though this is probably an overstatement, since we lack evidence that he undertook any explicit study of argumentation or that he influenced the theories of the Mohists or Xunzi.

Finally, instructors and peer coaches alike would benefit from working together to explore ways to generate a classroom environment that focuses on deep understanding of content through the explicit use of argumentation and reasoning.

His approach uses formal pragmatics philosophically to reflect upon norms and practices that are already explicit in justifications in various sorts of argumentation or second-order communication.

Metzger made explicit how this framework, established through oppositional argumentation, was far from new and did nothing but reintroduce the disembodied knower, historian and philosopher.

The implication of this finding is that in courses emphasizing cognitively challenging questions, students may require more explicit instruction on how to engage in argumentation.

Pragma-dialectics considers each argumentation to be "part of an explicit or implicit discussion between parties who try to resolve a difference of opinion (that may be implicit) by testing the acceptability of the standpoints concerned" (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004: 21).