Sentence examples for explanations claim that from inspiring English sources

The first set of explanations claim that this deviation from the null model is an artefact due either to errors in phylogenetic reconstruction or bias in data collection.

A second category of explanations claim that deviation from the ERM model accurately reflects that the speciation process is more complex than this model allows.

Republicans usually don't want to acknowledge that their purpose is to turn away voters, especially when race is involved, so they invented an explanation, claiming that stricter ID laws are necessary to prevent voter fraud.

They emphasis the pragmatic foundation of explanations and claim that whether an explanation is accepted or not depends on the context like the background knowledge of the audience (van Fraassen 1980).

Argument from Explanation: Externalists claim that psychological explanation can legitimately taxonomize mental states through factors that outstrip internal neurophysiology (Peacocke 1993).

But Princeton's Tilghman and others find a more sinister explanation; they claim that young scientists are getting stuck in the pipeline because their elders--their more experienced colleagues--routinely take advantage of an abundance of skilled labor by hiring them on the cheap, with NIH's implicit blessing.

The constructive empiricist can hence avoid saddling scientists with a commitment to the unobservable entities invoked in such explanations, properly claiming that such commitments are not licensed by the activity of science.

Note also, however, that some researchers dispute this explanation, claiming instead that these chemicals simply make the skin more flexible and compact.[3] What's not disputed is that these chemical exfoliants do usually give the skin a slightly more youthful appearance and improve its natural moisture levels.

Arguments to a sustaining cause of the cosmos claim that explanations of why something exists now cannot be adequate without assuming a present, contemporaneous sustaining cause.

Recall in particular that Hempel responds to putative counterexamples that attempt to show that the DN model fails to capture the directional features of explanation by claiming that these features are to be understood in terms of "pragmatics", rather than in terms of features a traditional, non-pragmatic theory might capture.

When asked for an explanation, Coffman claimed that he "misspoke".