The example in the above explanation of property 1 shows that the RANC correlate of complexity is not additive: The sum of the component complexities is 2+2 = 4, and the complexity of the mixture is 1.
As with olfaction, property 1 implies property 4. The color example in the above explanation of property 1 shows that perceived complexity is not additive: The sum of the complexities of greenish-yellow and reddish-yellow is 2+2 = 4, and the complexity of unique yellow perceived in the mixture is 1.
Thus, basic research on stem cells has been dominated by a search for explanations of properties thought to be common to stem cells, such as self-renewal, immortality, pluripotency and asymmetry of division.
Notably, the effect of film multi-scale structure on H2O/O2 selective permeability could be a supplement to conventional "tortuous path" theory for the explanation of barrier property improvement.
It presents such theories with a dilemma: either they are attempts to explicate the concept of consciousness, in which case they are circular; or they are attempts to provide a reductive explanation of the property of being conscious, in which case they generate a vicious regress (Rowlands 2001).
Thus it would be of interest to have a theoretical explanation of this property of Q, but we have been unable to provide this explanation.
But even if Nagel's account is weakened to allow approximative arguments (as Hempel modified his DN model of explanation), as some advocates of reductionism have urged (e.g., Schaffner, 1967; Churchland, 1985), this still doesn't circumvent the problem of the appeal to macroscopic properties in the explanation of microscopic properties.
LTL involves \ X,\) \(G\) and \(U\) only (no past operators), interpreted on \(\left\langle \mathbf{N,<}\right\rangle,\) and is very useful for expressing safety, liveness, fairness, and precedence properties of infinite computations in reactive systems Manna and Pnueli (1992); see explanation of these properties in 10.1 Section.
The kinetic theory of gases, like the theory of diatomic molecules, was a simple physical idea that chemists ignored in favour of an elaborate explanation of the properties of gases.
Although complex formation is an example of the linking together of species by the formation of covalent (but highly polar) bonds, the first systematic approach to the explanation of the properties of complexes was based on a model in which the effect of the ligands was treated as an essentially ionic problem.
(Only the smaller VP and V′ are shown in the partial structure (T2).) The complete sequence of transformations is taken to give a deep theoretical explanation of many properties of (B.i) and (B.ii), including such things as what could be substituted for the two NPs, and the fact there is at least rough truth-conditional equivalence between the two clauses.
