Sentence examples for explanation in section from inspiring English sources

The feature extraction of the CoLBP features follows the explanation in Section 2.1 such that all radii are extracted.

After this explanation in Section 2.2, we return to the derivation of the proposed model in Section 2.3 using these extracted gradient and isophote orientation estimates.

From the explanation in Section 3, we also know that the strong interference can share the upper amplitude space above the signal layer, and the weak interference can share the lower amplitude space below the signal layer.

According to the explanation in Section 3.3, the global-bias diffusion operation first projects the reconstructed residual associated with the downsampling set onto the low-pass filtering subspace, then preserves the non-downsampling set of new signal.

From the explanation in Section "Denoising performance of the HDR reconstruction formula", the reader may expect that an optimal weighting function is one that is constant everywhere in the clipping-free regions (w ij  = 1 − I z ij  ≤ 0) − I z ij  ≥ 2 B  − 1), with I the indicator function).

Finally, in order to take into account practical implementation issues, we define parameter dretx as the delay (in number of time slots) between reception of feedback and the next repetition in NDMA and H-NDMA protocols (see explanation in Section 2.1).

While the explanations in Section 2 were given with implicit floating-point arithmetic plus rounding operation (eqs. (3), (4), and (17)–(20)), the practical implementation of the 5/3 filter banks (53v1, 53v2) is based on plain integer arithmetic as follows.

For the moment, we note that the BHK-Interpretation or Proof Interpretation is not an interpretation in this mathematical sense, but is rather a meaning explanation; we will come back to such interpretations and their difference from explanations in section 4.5.2 below.

In fact, the perception-parallels-production principle and its subtractive effect on phoneme perception is the same that is also assumed here to underlie the F0 context effect the only exception being that the "segmental intonation" effect in fricative production may not simply be coarticulatory in nature, see the explanations in section 1.1 on larynx height.

(On this point, see the explanations in section 1 of Kalderon & Travis (2013).) Cook Wilson can also be taken here as implying that the meaning of a statement is be determined by the question to which it is an answer, as did R. G. Collingwood (Collingwood 1938, 265n)., who used the idea as the basis for his 'logic of questions and answers' (Collingwood 2013, chap. 5; 1998, chaps.

We will discuss alternative explanations in Section 6.