Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
The most plausible explanation for this deviation are the different sampling locations (hind leg vs. major neck arteries) with differences in delay/dispersion (including their correction by PMOD in case of AIF) leading to different bolus dynamics.
A possible explanation for this deviation is that the mapped caldera is a collapsed feature filled in with lava during a second shield stage as suggested by Flinders et al. (2010), for the positive residual gravity offset of the island of Kaua'i in the Northern Hawaiian Islands.
Small numbers of subjects in the GG genotypes of both polymorphisms would be a possible explanation for this deviation.
A possible explanation for this deviation might be that the RTs were somewhat unusually long for the visual accuracy trials (see Fig. 3).
An explanation for this deviation might be that career motivation is a multidimensional construct comprising underlying factors that include different degrees of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, respectively.
The authors could find no obvious explanation for this deviation, but the large excess of E types could be explained by a second, sex-linked locus with a dominant E-strain allele.
Similar(54)
We have added a discussion of the possible explanations for this deviation in the text.
For the Earth's atmospheric network and the human metabolic network, we look into more detail for an underlying explanation of this deviation.
Further it goes on to attempt an explanation for the deviation from this pattern observed in the Arl8 GTPases.
An explanation for this difference may be deviations in structural gene properties that influence splicing.
Even a short period with high turnover during adulthood could markedly influence the C level in the tendon tissue at sampling time, and this could be a potential explanation for the deviation of some samples from the 0 17 yr moving average (e.g., 3 samples marked with a circle in Fig. 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com