Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
No satisfactory explanation for deviations from the Stoke's law exist (Clark et al. 1981).
Environmental heterogeneity is invoked as an explanation for deviations between empirical patterns and neutral expectations in the spatial context and over ecological time [7], [9], [10].
This is in contrast to much of the theoretical literature that supposes a variety of other specifications of learning rules and both time-independent and payoff-dependent explanations for deviations.
Potential ecological and methodological explanations for deviations from the model suggest that spatial and temporal heterogeneity are important drivers of the structure of these large networks.
The most plausible explanation for this deviation are the different sampling locations (hind leg vs. major neck arteries) with differences in delay/dispersion (including their correction by PMOD in case of AIF) leading to different bolus dynamics.
A possible explanation for this deviation is that the mapped caldera is a collapsed feature filled in with lava during a second shield stage as suggested by Flinders et al. (2010), for the positive residual gravity offset of the island of Kaua'i in the Northern Hawaiian Islands.
Further it goes on to attempt an explanation for the deviation from this pattern observed in the Arl8 GTPases.
Small numbers of subjects in the GG genotypes of both polymorphisms would be a possible explanation for this deviation.
Outliers were identified by Grubb's test and considered as missing if no plausible explanation for the deviation was available.
A possible explanation for this deviation might be that the RTs were somewhat unusually long for the visual accuracy trials (see Fig. 3).
An explanation for this deviation might be that career motivation is a multidimensional construct comprising underlying factors that include different degrees of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, respectively.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com