Karpen explains that "it is, in a sense, a scene of modern crucifixion".
Martin (1984) explains that "it is… the use of paradigmatically based metafunctional components in the grammar which most clearly distinguishes systemic from other functionalist approaches".
Story explains that, "it gives a slightly less mechanical and more painterly distortion to the draftsmanship".
In the press release, he explains that "it is part of movie history... the original was one of the great all-time thrillers.
Its label explains that it is "possibly" effective for eczema and other skin conditions.
Palantir explains that it is a toolset for use in human analysis on its website.
Phil explains that it would come under the "other" category.
Life explains that it is part of the reason his costume is on the sober side.
Mather explains that it creates tension and it's maybe not a great idea for office morale.
A museum wall label explains that it represents the opposition to his health-care-reform effort.
One explains that it was only after coming to Australia that she realised rape was unacceptable.
