Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The first principal component explains, respectively, 39% (EU), 40% (JP), and 44% (UK) of the proxies' variance.
So, the fact of belonging to the control or to the clinical groups explains, respectively, 10%and12%2% of the variance of these variables.
Similar(58)
These methods are explained respectively.
In fact, for the longest lead period, the C-FSM and TPC-FSM were able of explaining respectively 84.6% and 86.5% of the actual river flow variation.
The effect of the last two variables was explained respectively in terms of the reaction mechanism of n-paraffins on bifuctional catalyst and the effect of the vapour liquid equilibrium (VLE) on apparent conversion rate and isomer content of products.
A single-factor model for the E-VS and a 2-factor model for the E-BS were resulted from the EFA with large factor loadings and about 47% and 56% of variance explained respectively.
In Hangzhou, we identified qACE6-2, qDCE6 and qPGWC6, explained respectively up to 9.2, 30.6 and 30.5%% of the phenotypic variation and located within 10.92 ~ 22.12 cM on chromosome 6.
The volcano shape of the O2 and OH adsorption with composition in Cu was explained, respectively, by firstly the highest bond distance that reduces adsorption energy of oxygen and the compromise between low DOS(Ef) and secondly, low band width (W) reach for Pd3Cu which leads to the highest OH adsorption energy.
Using the same regression analysis as in the cursor analysis, including trial number and block trial number, perturbation and x-acceleration range were significantly accounted for by these predictors, with 45% and 12% explained, respectively (p's<.001).
On the other hand, the seldom detection of parainfluenza virus or influenza A virus could be explained respectively by the recruitment restricted to the winter season and the very young age of the infants.
Linear and non linear models were compared in their classification and prediction tasks: non linear model resulted to be better at data fitting (36% vs. 10% variance explained, respectively) and provided more reliable parameters for accuracy and mis-classification rates (70 % and 30 vs. 66% and 34%, respectivs.y).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com