Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Poincaré Conjecture: The riddle Perelman solved *Henri Poincaré thought explaining the proof of his famous conjecture would take far too long.
Similar(57)
We will now explain the proof [78] of the meromorphic continuation of ( zeta _R ).
end{aligned}On one hand, as explained in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we note that (Lule 0) at point ((x^0,t^0)).
This in turn implies the claimed tightness of (big { |f t, cdot )|^p ;big | ; t in [0,T] big } subset L^1({{mathbb R}^{N}})) as explained in the proof of Proposition 32.
Conversely, if S is a maximal split torus of G then the maximal split torus corresponding to m ( S ) is the maximal split torus of the radical of the reductive group Z G ( R m ( S ) ) = Z G ( s ) = Z G ( S ) as explained in the proof of (1).
Mike Church, from Durham University's department of archaeology, says: "The majority of archaeological evidence for this early colonisation is likely to have been destroyed by the major Viking invasion, explaining the lack of proof found in the Faroes for the earlier settlement.
Figure 2 This figure explains the idea of the proof of theorem for n = 3.
We will now briefly explain the idea of the proof of Theorem 5.1.
The idea of this principle is explained for example in [24], in the proof of Theorem 2.4, p.233.
if 2 d k C R = ( ω + k C k ) 2, z 0 ∈ C. In order to explain our complex method and give the proof of Theorem 1, we need some lemmas and results.
ABC Bakers quickly sent letters explaining the oversight (and showing proof of kosher certification from the Orthodox Union) to Scout councils.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com