Sentence examples for explaining how distinct from inspiring English sources

The GFRα1-mediated contacts are crucial, particularly close to the invariant RET calcium-binding site, whereas few direct contacts are made by GDNF, explaining how distinct ligand/coreceptor pairs are accommodated.

Together, these data provide a paradigm explaining how distinct stresses can activate p53 (summarized in Figure 3).

By accepting the existence of abstract entities (like shapes and weights), the trope theorist is able to explain how distinct concrete particulars can be simultaneously similar to, and different from, each other.

Since instrumental theorists work with overall evaluations of how well off individuals would be were certain rights ascribed, they must explain how distinct categories of interests (e.g., health, income, opportunities for self-expression, social recognition) trade off against one another.

If these eigenvectors 'map' to different parts of the network, this could explain how distinct regions process information on different timescales.

Second, there is a general problem of explaining how two distinct things could have all the same constituents.

We hypothesized that CAML may act to enhance tetherin-mediated restriction of particle release and thereby explain how two distinct factors could be responsible for Vpu-responsive restriction.

More specifically, he is burdened with trying to explain how two really distinct substances seem to be interacting causally.

In this introduction, we review this literature stream, introduce the papers in this special issue, and highlight the theoretical approaches that help explain how organizations in distinct national contexts overcome the pressure emanating from institutional changes in developing economies.

Historically attempts to explain how multiple phenotypically distinct cell types arise within the crypt have assumed the creation of lineage-restricted progenitors that can be distinguished by different transcription factor profiles [ 1,2].

"Pulling" refers to citing the opponent's precedent in accepting an assertion about something and challenging him to explain how the precedent is distinct from the case at hand.