The explained variances at level 1 and level 2 are 28 and 80%, respectively, which is adequately high.
The accumulative explained variances are respectively 66.948, 61.917, 59.127, 77.445%, which suggests the construct validity of the model is high.
The first two axes of PCA and PLS-DA describes more than 40% of variances with good values of explained variances.
In the field with high abundance, after trend removal, the variogram models for anecic and endogeic earthworms were rejected based on their negative explained variances.
Hip circumference is an effective predictor for EITW values with percentages of explained variances of 64.1% for male and 61.2% for female.
Induced through the addition of the fluid intelligence, the explained variances of the constructive (40%%) and analytical (51%%) problem-solving competencies increased slightly.
In the field, the HOBS showed a linear response up to 2000 mg L−1 and a non-linear response up to 10,000 mg L−1 with explained variances between 75%and83%3%.
Further testing showed that the HOBS had a non-linear but regular response to bulk sediment concentrations from 0 to ∼3500 mg L−1, with explained variances of 99.2% to 99.8%.
The large increases in the explained variances on both levels show the importance of this variable.
Table 1 presents estimates of explained variances for the three traits using the seven models considered.
Finally, in scenario III, named 'C predominant', explained variances equaled 20, 60, and 20%.
