Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
explained to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "explained to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone has provided information or clarification to another person or group. Example: "The teacher explained to the students the importance of studying for their exams."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"Oro," Juan explained to Jorge.
News & Media
"Mat'," the man explained to the team.
News & Media
He explained to me what happened.
News & Media
"No," she explained to the two women.
News & Media
Nothing has really been explained to me.
News & Media
"It was explained to us.
News & Media
Was it explained to them?
News & Media
Extraordinary awards should be explained to shareholders.
Academia
You have heard it explained to you.
Academia
People who like being explained to?
News & Media
It should be explained to people.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "explained to", ensure the context clearly indicates who is explaining and who is receiving the explanation for better clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "explained to" in passive constructions where the explainer is unclear. Instead of "It was explained to me", specify who provided the explanation: "The professor explained it to me".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "explained to" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of providing an explanation directed towards a specific recipient. Ludwig examples show its use in conveying information or instructions.
Frequent in
News & Media
46%
Academia
32%
Science
13%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "explained to" is a versatile and commonly used verb phrase that signifies the act of providing an explanation to someone. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely accepted. Its usage spans across various contexts, with a strong presence in News & Media and Academia, reflecting its neutrality and applicability in both formal and informal settings. Remember to ensure clarity by specifying both the explainer and the recipient, and to avoid passive constructions that obscure who is doing the explaining. For alternative expressions, consider "clarified for", "detailed for", or "described to", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
clarified for
Focuses on making something easier to understand.
made clear to
Focuses on the result of understanding.
detailed for
Implies a thorough explanation was provided.
broken down for
Implies simplifying complex information.
described to
Emphasizes the act of giving an account of something.
laid out for
Implies a structured and organized explanation.
elucidated to
Suggests making something obscure clear and understandable.
interpreted for
Highlights the process of understanding and explaining the meaning of something.
presented to
Highlights the act of showing or offering something for consideration.
walked through with
Suggests guiding someone step-by-step through a process.
FAQs
How do I use "explained to" in a sentence?
Use "explained to" to show that someone provided clarification or information to someone else. For example, "The scientist "explained the theory to" her colleagues".
What are some alternatives to "explained to"?
Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "clarified for", "detailed for", or "described to".
Is there a difference between "explained to" and "explained for"?
"Explained to" indicates the recipient of the explanation, while "explained for" suggests the purpose of the explanation. "He explained the rules to me" versus "He explained the rules for the benefit of the new players".
Which is correct: "it was explained to me" or "it was explained me"?
"It was explained to me" is the correct form. The preposition "to" is necessary to indicate the recipient of the explanation. The sentence "It was explained me" is grammatically incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested