Sentence examples for explained no significant differences in from inspiring English sources

Species explained no significant differences in our measured dependent variables (Tables  2 and 3).

No difference was observed in degranulation between wild-type and SRC-3-/ BMMCs, explaining no significant difference in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis between wild-type and SRC-3-/ mice.

This explains why no significant differences in the size and morphology of the QDs are seen in both samples.

These findings help explain why no significant differences in CD4+ T cell proliferation were observed when T cells were incubated with wild-type or MMR knock-out DCs pulsed with mannosylated OVA antigens [18].

From these data, we conclude that upon loss of HDAC1, proliferation as well as apoptosis are elevated in teratomas, which explains that no significant differences in tumour size and weight were observed.

The results indicate that premature DXR leakage from immunoliposomes occurring before the actual target cell binding and subsequent DXR association with the tumour cells, explains why no significant differences in anti-tumour activity between DXR-immunoliposomes and non-targeted DXR-liposomes were observed in vivo.

This could at least in part explain why there were no significant differences in these measures despite the higher prevalence of GDM among the control group mothers.

Moreover, the current data do not definitively explain why there were no significant differences in blood velocity among the four diabetic groups.

To explain such variety, we found no significant differences in sampling settings as to be either inpatient or outpatient.

However, these links did not explain the intervention effect, because there were no significant differences in adiposity between intervention and control groups.

Interestingly, the areas that were associated to change in cognition were different from those affected from the treatment, which may explain the previous finding that there were no significant differences in the cognitive outcomes between the two treatment groups (14).