Interestingly, epistasis tended to increase the proportion of variance explained by the correct model (Figure 4).
In order to compare results to some QTL type studies, we also calculate the proportion of variance explained by the correct model in each simulation.
This result can be intuitively explained by the fact that, once the correct methodology is applied, it is an increment of pressure, not its absolute value, that causes an additional passive inflation of the tissue, and it is the ratio between these two increments that determines the stiffness of the material and the decay of active tension.
The lack of reported improvement in practices could be explained by the high rates of correct practices reported at baseline, possibly related to the social desirability response bias.
The lack of understanding of this category of knowledge is probably partially explained by the low (5 6%) correct response rates for questions targeting SCs in the subcategory development in populations (SCd), as well as FCs in development.
Uncorrected endometrial cancer rates showed a levelling-off in the 1980s not seen in corrected rates, explained by the increasing prevalence of hysterectomy a change not recognised previously.
The fewer cases of cryptorchidism reported by the 18- to 30-year-olds may be explained by the fact that these conditions were corrected (spontaneously or medically) during the first year of life and the older sons had no knowledge of this.
This significant correlation (between the Noe method and transfusion within 4 weeks) was not confirmed by the other methods and thus might best be explained by the fact that we did not correct for repeat measurements.
The failure to realize amelioration of interlaboratory non-equivalence is explained by the fact that standardization does not correct for analytical non-specificity problems, as is the case with the Jaffe method [ 28, 29].
MSH6 mutations result in a weaker mutator phenotype (Kolodner et al, 1999), which may be explained by the major function of MSH6 to correct base base mismatches and single nucleotide deletion loops but not larger deletion loops (Parc et al, 2000).
