Our findings indicate that the continued decrease of ES and biodiversity in Germany can be explained by implementation deficits within a well-established nature conservation system.
These trends are partly explained by implementation failures as well as delays in incorporate new knowledge in order to orient plan of action.
The absence of any impact can be explained by poor implementation of the intervention, reflecting non-acceptance and/or lack of willingness of doctors to change at the intervention sites.
The increase in non-pulmonary complications may be explained by the implementation of targeted temperature management protocols, or by higher incidence of aspiration, and thus sicker patients [ 7], which might predispose to infection and consequent multiple organ failure [ 27].
The higher number of patients in the study group can be explained by strict implementation of inclusion criteria for the control group.
The significant decline of airborne silica observed in the construction industry could be explained by the implementation of advanced health and safety programs, effective engineering controls, work practice controls, and personal protective equipment (Flanagan et al. 2003; Flynn and Susi 2003).
This finding may be explained by the implementation of new legislation, the so-called GMG, in 2004 [ 18].
The increase in the computational time can be explained by the numerical implementation of the new method's structure.
This can be explained by the gradual implementation of the RAI 2.0 instrument across Canada (see Additional file 1: Table S2 for more details).
