In western popular culture such theories co-exist uneasily with biologically essentialist accounts of sexual identity, which look for a particular gene, brain structure, or other biological feature that is noninteractive with environment and that will explain same-sex sexual desire.
All of these shows focused on gay couples who (for some reason) weren't allowed to be gay on TV, so ridiculous back stories and ludicrous plot twists were introduced to explain same-sex couples raising children, living together, or being psychiatrists.
Its greatest hits include: "Star Wars, explained," "SoulCycle, explained," "Same-sex marriage in the US, explained," "The internet, explained," and "Anthony Weiner and the rise of dick pics, explained".
We also examined a simple point source model to try to explain the same dataset.
Do we have reason to think that without assuming compositionality we would not be able to explain the same things?
Paradigm shifts usually require the new paradigm to explain the same phenomena the old one did, and some more.
Evolution does not conflict with creationism or intelligent design because the ideas do not attempt to explain the same things.
Understanding discontinuities in the Australian archaeological record currently represents a major challenge for researchers especially where different interpretive frameworks are used to explain the same phenomena.
Anti-realists have suggested that two theories are descriptively equivalent if each theory can be interpreted in the other and both theories explain the same phenomena.
I launched into it with no problem, so used to having to explain the same thing over and over again.
Coming out to the bus driver a few minutes later to explain the same thing about my license.
