Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
experts in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"experts in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to people who are knowledgeable in a certain field or subject. For example, "We need to consult experts in quantum physics to help us solve the problem."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
52 human-written examples
Experts in criminal profiling concurred.
News & Media
Experts in quality measurement agree in principle.
News & Media
They're experts in what they do.
News & Media
So did 30 experts in legal ethics.
News & Media
"That's why we called the experts in.
News & Media
We're experts in this and he's not.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
8 human-written examples
"He was an expert in martial arts.
News & Media
But the expert in question denies this.
News & Media
Are you an expert in bees?
News & Media
I'm becoming an expert in poop.
News & Media
He was an expert in combat".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "experts in", ensure that the field of expertise is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "experts in data science" rather than just "experts".
Common error
Avoid using "experts in" without specifying the area of expertise. Saying someone is an "expert in everything" diminishes the value of true expertise and makes the statement less credible.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "experts in" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, typically acting as a subject complement or an appositive. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used. Examples from Ludwig show it modifying nouns to specify areas of expertise.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
12%
Less common in
Wiki
6%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "experts in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote individuals or groups with specialized knowledge and skills. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It is particularly prevalent in news, scientific, and business contexts, where identifying expertise is crucial. When using this phrase, be sure to specify the area of expertise to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives such as "specialists in" or "authorities on" for nuanced communication. By following these guidelines, you can effectively and accurately convey the presence of expertise in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
specialists in
Substitutes "experts" with a term that indicates focused training and experience.
knowledgeable in
Emphasizes the possession of information and understanding.
authorities in
Replaces "experts" with a term suggesting recognized command or control of knowledge.
skilled in
Highlights the developed talent and ability in a specific area.
adept at
Focuses on skillful performance, implying practical competence.
proficient in
Shifts focus to the demonstrated ability within a field, rather than recognition.
leading authorities on
More emphatic replacement for "experts", suggesting influence and prominence.
veterans in
Implies a longer duration of experience and expertise.
masters of
Suggests a high level of skill and control, more elevated and formal.
gurus in
More informal and trend-oriented term for "experts".
FAQs
How can I use "experts in" in a sentence?
Use "experts in" to indicate individuals or groups possessing specialized knowledge or skill in a particular field. For example, "We consulted "experts in renewable energy" to advise on our sustainability initiatives."
What is a good substitute for the phrase "experts in"?
Alternatives include "specialists in", "authorities on", or "proficient in", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it more appropriate to say "experts in" or "experts on"?
Both "experts in" and "experts on" are grammatically correct, but "experts in" is typically used when referring to a field or area of practice, while "experts on" is often used for specific topics or subjects.
How do you determine who qualifies as "experts in" a certain field?
Typically, "experts in" a field are recognized through their education, years of experience, publications, and professional achievements. Their opinions and work are generally well-regarded by peers and the broader community.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested