Exact(10)
The enrichment level of Sty1 binding sites was well correlated between the two experiments (correlation coefficient = 0.84; p-value<2.2e-16 p-value<2.2e-16 p-value<2.2e-16
The results were analysed statistically by design of experiments, correlation analysis, and marginal means plots.
For the results of the leaching experiments, correlation matrices were calculated utilizing Pearson's method to help identify possible relationships between the extracted concentrations, pH, time, and temperature.
Unlike the previous experiments, correlation between methane and DO was not strong (r = −0.181), but ORP (r = −0.769) and pH (r = −0.741) showed strong correlations with methane at a significance level of 0.01 (Table 2), where pH was 6.8 ± 0.015, during the experiment.
However, comparison of transfer frequency between plasmids and genomic DNA of the same strain (GMI1000) for the other targeted DNA positions showed some discrepancies in spite of a significant (p<0.01) correlation between the two experiments (correlation coefficient = 0.69; Table 2).
We observed a high degree of correlation between the two paraquat experiments (correlation coefficient c = 0.86, Fig. 2a).
Similar(50)
As this process may involve many gassing-out experiments, correlations between kL a and tunable reactor/process variables could be quite advantageous.
The statistically significant (within each experiment) and consistent (across multiple experiments) correlations helped us identify a TF that is active within a phase-specific regulatory context as well as its targets therein.
Likewise, in our second experiment correlation between motility and plasma membrane integrity was not observed.
To evaluate the relationship among the different variables in the experiment, correlation coefficients were used by SAS 9_1_3 portable.
For hierarchical clustering of array experiment correlation coefficients the CLUSTER program was used to organise experiments into self organising maps, subsequently complete linkage hierarchical cluster using an uncentered correlation metric was applied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com