Exact(2)
All microarray data presented are in accordance with the Microarray Gene Expression Data Society's minimum information about microarray experiment recommendations [ 62].
In this article, we describe some of these submissions and report on our assessment of data content, format, and quality control metrics that were useful for evaluating these nonclinical genomics submissions, specifically in relation to the proposed MIAME/MINTox (minimum information about a microarray experiment/minimum information needed for a toxicology experiment) recommendations.
Similar(58)
With these ideas in mind, we developed a data-driven experiment recommendation system to identify the minimal set of maximally informative experiments for functional characterization of the S. bayanus genome based on the S. cerevisiae gene-expression literature (Guan et al. 2010).
Based on the outcome of the experiments, recommendations for improved grouting of BHE are made, which can also be included in official guidelines.
Since it was difficult to predict the biosafety threats of these new experiments, recommendations mentioned at that time stressed the exercise of an extra vigilance.
In the experiments, recommendation accuracy was sensitive to the parameters.
In compliance with the Minimun Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) recommendations, raw data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under series accession number GSE22035.
The microarray data were prepared according to minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) recommendations [ 44] and deposited in the Array Express [ 45].
The microarray data were prepared according to minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) recommendations and deposited in the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).nih.gov/geo/
The microarray data were prepared according to "minimum information about a microarray experiment" (MIAME) recommendations, deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and can be accessed via the web [ 65].
In light of what you learned in your experiment, give recommendations on the design of future experiments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com