experience with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "experience with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing someone's exposure to a certain activity or event. For example, "He has a lot of experience with public speaking."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Experience with novel: one paragraph.

The New York Times

"Experience with men.

The New Yorker

"Operational experience with partner investigative agencies".

Independent

They had experience with this, after all.

The New York Times - Sports

His experience with United States carriers?

The New York Times - Travel

The Georgians have bitter experience with this.

The New York Times

He also has extensive experience with tours.

The New York Times

So he has experience with pets.

The New York Times - Science

Sharing that experience with her was special".

The New York Times

Experience with story collection: four paragraphs.

The New York Times

"He has no experience with it.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's qualifications, use "experience with" to highlight practical skills and direct involvement in specific tasks or areas.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating your "experience with" a particular skill or technology. Be honest about your proficiency level to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "experience with" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, typically used to specify the area or subject in which someone has practical involvement or expertise. Ludwig examples confirm its usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

18%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

9%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "experience with" is a versatile and commonly used expression for indicating proficiency or familiarity in a specific area. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability. It is most frequently found in news and media, formal business contexts, and science, highlighting its relevance across various fields. Alternatives such as "familiarity with" or "expertise in" can be used to express similar meanings, each with subtle differences in emphasis. When using this phrase, it's important to be honest about the level of experience and tailor the language to the specific context. Whether you're writing a resume, a report, or engaging in conversation, understanding the nuances of "experience with" can enhance the clarity and impact of your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

familiarity with

Focuses on the level of knowledge and understanding rather than direct involvement.

expertise in

Emphasizes skill and proficiency developed through experience.

background in

Highlights previous involvement or training in a particular area.

knowledge of

Stresses the understanding and awareness of a subject, possibly without direct practical application.

exposure to

Implies a degree of contact or acquaintance, often without deep involvement.

history of

Refers to a record of past involvement or events related to something.

involvement in

Highlights active participation or engagement in a specific activity or area.

understanding of

Focuses on comprehension and insight into a subject matter.

practical knowledge of

Emphasizes hands-on understanding and application.

competence in

Highlights the ability to perform a task effectively and efficiently.

FAQs

How do I use "experience with" in a sentence?

Use "experience with" to describe your familiarity or expertise in a particular area. For example, "I have experience with project management software".

What can I say instead of "experience with"?

You can use alternatives like "familiarity with", "expertise in", or "background in" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "experience with" or "experience in"?

Both "experience with" and "experience in" are correct, but "experience with" often implies a more direct and hands-on involvement. Choose the preposition that best fits the context.

How does "experience with" differ from "knowledge of"?

"Experience with" implies practical application and direct involvement, while "knowledge of" suggests understanding and awareness, possibly without direct practical application.