Sentence examples for expensive charges from inspiring English sources
The phrase "expensive charges" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when referring to high fees or costs associated with a service or product. Example: "The hotel had expensive charges for room service, which surprised many guests."
Expensive charges can also be incurred for roaming, when a user travels out of a company's defined area of coverage or, as often occurs, when traveling overseas.
It will also help make Heathrow better; their expensive charges would come down and they would be better incentivised to alleviate "Heathrow hassle", which has blighted British travellers for years.
The Which? executive director Richard Lloyd said: "Capping EU mobile roaming charges is welcome news for millions of travellers, especially those who have faced expensive charges for data roaming when their mobile hasn't even left their suitcase.
There is also a Latin American equivalent, the Copa Libertadores, as well as competitions organised by the football federations in Central and North America, Asia, Oceania and Africa.Football clubs dislike releasing their expensive charges to play for their national sides, but they have no choice.
A room at 20 francs a month; lunch at 18 sous and dinner at 22, which makes two francs a day, or 60 francs a month.... Then you have the studio to pay for: the Atelier Suisse, one of the least expensive, charges, I think, 10 francs.
So if you're an international traveller that is also a heavy internet user, you may be able to save money by renting a mobile hotspot that connects directly to a local cellular network and avoids expensive charges for data usage.
Banks are the most expensive, charging an average of 13% of the total amount.
Visit from Aunt, proving expensive, charged to insurance as she was wealthy.
Back then he described the Coalition's current climate policy as "a recipe for fiscal recklessness on a grand scale" and "a very expensive charge on the budget in the years ahead".
The former Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull said in 2011 that continuing to use a big government taxpayer-funded scheme to reduce emissions in the long term would "become a very expensive charge on the budget in the years ahead".
Modelling has found that cutting emissions further than 5% under Direct Action would be prohibitively expensive – the same charge levelled by the Coalition minister Malcolm Turnbull when he explained in 2011 that continuing to use a big government taxpayer-funded scheme to reduce emissions in the long term would "become a very expensive charge on the budget in the years ahead".
