Expenditures authorized under a national budget are divided into two main categories.
The words "for expenditures authorized by law" are substituted for "for the purposes of this Act. . . and to meet public expenditures authorized by law" for clarity and because they are inclusive.
The 1974 legislation in question was passed as a result of President Nixon's refusal to make expenditures authorized by Congress that he disagreed with.
With the approval of the President, the Secretary of the Treasury may borrow on the credit of the United States Government amounts necessary for expenditures authorized by law and may issue notes of the Government for the amounts borrowed and may buy, redeem, and make refunds under section 3111 of this title.
The problem with this argument is that the overall expenditures were authorized by Congress, no matter how vaguely, and the people will have the chance to vote out the congressmen who gave Treasury such a big blank check.
In 2005 the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that the governor had no authority to expend funds without legislative approval, and that if legislators failed to pass a budget in the future, only expenditures explicitly authorized in the state constitution could be made.
The budget also divides authorized expenditure into that which can be carried out without action by Congress and that which requires further authorization.
The educators asserted in a lawsuit filed in State Supreme Court in Albany County that Mr. Paterson had no power to withhold money after its expenditure had been authorized by the Legislature.
(e) of this section, which required the Secretary, in consultation with the Council, to annually prepare and submit to appropriate committees of Congress a report describing the expenditure of funds authorized to be appropriated under this section, with any recommendations of the Secretary, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub.
The decision to seek treatment of the ill child was usually made by the mother in 854 (53.2%) households, whereas the father/husband mainly authorized expenditure for treatment of sick children in 1,173 (73.1%) households.
all programs under... the Act". Flast, supra, at 87. Rather, they claimed that defendant administrators' approval of such expenditures was not authorized by the Act, or alternatively, to the extent the expenditures were authorized, the Act was "unconstitutional and void". Ibid.
