expected to take

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "expected to take" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing anticipated actions, responsibilities, or durations related to a task or event. Example: "The project is expected to take six months to complete."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The trial is expected to take weeks.

The New York Times

Negotiations are expected to take several months.

The New York Times

Construction is expected to take 18 months.

The New York Times

It is expected to take weeks.

The New York Times

The user is expected to take notes.

Columbia University

That is expected to take three days.

The New York Times

Construction is expected to take 14 months.

The New York Times

That is expected to take many weeks.

The New York Times

Coalition negotiations are expected to take weeks.

The Guardian - Business

That process is expected to take months.

The New York Times

That inquiry is expected to take months.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "expected to take" when providing an estimated timeframe for a project, task, or event. For example: "The renovation is "expected to take" three months."

Common error

Avoid using "expected to took". The correct form is "expected to take", using the base form of the verb.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "expected to take" primarily functions as part of an infinitive phrase, often used with a form of the verb "to be". Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "expected to take" is a versatile and frequently used expression for indicating anticipated durations or requirements across various domains. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is commonly found in news reports, academic literature, and scientific publications, as well as more general contexts. When using this phrase, it's crucial to maintain the correct tense and consider context when opting for alternatives like "anticipated to require" or "projected to last". This detailed analysis provides a solid understanding of its proper usage and context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

anticipated to require

Emphasizes the necessity of something for the task.

projected to last

Specifically indicates the estimated duration.

estimated to need

Highlights the resources or time needed.

anticipated to span

Focuses on the extent or reach of the duration.

foreseen to involve

Highlights the actions or elements expected.

likely to consume

Indicates the resources or time that will be used.

predicted to demand

Stresses the requirements or efforts needed.

calculated to extend

Implies a precise estimate of the duration.

presumed to necessitate

Focuses on the unavoidable requirements.

reckoned to encompass

Highlights the scope or range of the duration.

FAQs

How can I use "expected to take" in a sentence?

Use "expected to take" to indicate a predicted duration or requirement. For example, "The surgery is "expected to take" about two hours."

What are some alternatives to "expected to take"?

You can use alternatives like "anticipated to require", "projected to last", or "estimated to need" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "expected to took" instead of "expected to take"?

No, "expected to took" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is always "expected to take", using the infinitive form of the verb.

What is the difference between "expected to take" and "likely to take"?

"Expected to take" implies a prediction based on some form of calculation or estimation. "Likely to take" suggests a probability based on circumstances, but "likely to take" may not be as precise as "expected to take".