Sentence examples for expected overlap of from inspiring English sources

Therefore the overlap of FTLD within FES was 14% (compared to an expected overlap of 1.2% if the FTLD map was randomly distributed in the brain mask).

The overlap of FES within FTLD was 5% (compared to an expected overlap of 0.4% if the FES mask was randomly distributed in the brain mask).

While this is significantly higher than the expected overlap of 1.4% (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0008), the two methods are often in disagreement whether a sequence is significantly clustered.

For ABA-repressed gene sets, all have significant pairwise overlaps as compared with the expected overlap of two random sets except for the ABA-repressed gene sets in [ 16, 18, 27] which have non-significant overlaps with several other studies.

Third, our list also contained 13 of the 58 proteins that were found in as Tel1/Mec1 targets in a quantitative mass spectrometry analysis (expected overlap of 3.702 proteins, p = 1.139e-05) [ 13].

Second, of the 28 Mec1/Tel1-dependent and Rad53-independent phosphoproteins that were induced after exposure of wildtype and rad53Δ yeast to methyl methanosulfonate, 7 were present in our list (expected overlap of 1.787 proteins, p = 2.575e-04) [ 12].

Based on these findings and following Nunn [10], we regressed expected overlap on the number of females (mean slope = 1.06, with 100% of coefficients positive; mean λ = 0.81).

Although stratified sampling is commonly used to organize the units of observation naturally distributed over non-overlapped strata, such as geographical regions (Thompson 2012), the expected overlapping of subjects in the context of social networks groups can suggest some affinity among them, supporting the re-organization of the sampling frame into a smaller set of groups.

These overlaps are highly significant based on the expected overlaps of 27 and four percent for H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 domains, respectively.

The table shows the sizes of the sets of activated and repressed genes for NFIB and GR, the size of the overlaps of the gene sets, the expected overlap size, fold enrichment of the overlap and the p-value of the overlap enrichment.

The expectation of ∼165 overlaps in the absence of sex-specific effects was calculated as follows: expected overlap = (number of significant transcript/marker pairs)* [fraction true positives]*[power]+[fraction false positives]*[overlap between false positives]).