Sentence examples for expected no difference from inspiring English sources
As expected, no difference was found for TACSTD2 (Trop2), and neuroendocrine markers showed little expression (fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM <0.18) in and no difference between the two populations (Fig. 1c).
As expected, no difference in breathing rhythms was found among the four periods (pre-SC, post-SC, pre-NS and post-NS) since the subjects were forced to breathe through their mouths and as such, respiration was not influenced either by NS or SC (SM-C).
As expected, no difference was observed for the control cells when CD19 was activated.
In the occipitonasal length against basal length, there was as expected no difference between the two modern forms.
As expected, no difference in disposition index was observed in this non-diabetic high-risk study population of offspring of type 2 diabetes patients.
As expected, no difference in ICP0 or IRF3 localization or ISG induction was observed following infection with R7914 in the presence or absence of MG132.
As expected, no differences in sequence were found in promoters amplified from S288C strain and the sequences deposited in the NCBI and SGD database (Table 2).
As a control WT NOD and TLR3KO mice were also infected with LCMV and as expected, no differences in APC maturation were observed (Figure S2).
As expected, no differences were observed after the long occlusion period where the conditional probability of target events was equated across all trial types [Fs (1, 17) <2.23, p's>.10].
As expected, no differences in aggregate morphology were noticed between the Aβ(1 40) samples in the presence of Ca2+ and the Aβ(1 40 E22G samples in the presence or absence of added Ca2+ (Fig. 4E, H, K).
As expected, no differences in area X FoxP2 levels were observed between sham operated and untreated birds, indicating that the surgery itself had no effect (mean±SEM levels in area X relative to levels in the outlying striatum, Sham vs. Untreated – 3' probe: 1.05±0.06 vs. 1.09±0.03, p = 0.38; mid-probe: 1.05±0.04 vs. 1.11±0.04, p = 0.19).
