Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Instrument span should be approximately 200 per cent of the expected instrument data display output corresponding to the emission standard for the source.
However, the observed changes were small compared to the expected instrument error of blood gas analyzers.
Similar(58)
For example, behavioral scientists may expect to see survey reliabilities ranging from 0.25 to 0.75, while a biomedical engineer may expect instrument reliabilities of at least 0.90.
If instrument developers expected the instrument to give results for the measured concept similar to those measured by existing PRO or non-PRO measures (e.g., physical or physician-based measures), the FDA is interested in documented demonstration of those relationships to determine whether the instrument convincingly measures that concept and can therefore support a claim about that concept.
Furthermore, we expected the instrument to provide sufficient information to talk more effectively about psychosocial matters.
The majority expected the instrument to provide more precise nosological data, so that diagnoses could be more reliable and appropriate treatment would be delivered earlier.
If developers expected the instrument to discriminate between patient groups (e.g., between patients with different levels of severity), the FDA is interested in evidence that shows the instrument meaningfully discriminates.
However, even though participants were carefully instructed how to wear the accelerometer, rather individual attachments to the body must be expected, and instrument position might change as a result of lose attachment combined with body movements (which in the end will contribute to an increased random variation in the field).
Undoubtedly, high correlations are expected among instruments with similar designs (e.g. the SPADI and the DASH), verifying construct validity.
Many had expected the Instruments of Accession to be permanent, and were unhappy about losing the autonomy and the guaranteed continued existence of their states they had expected to gain.
The correlation was good but not perfect which is expected from instruments based on different constructs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com