expected for first

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "expected for first" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incomplete thought or a misphrasing, and without additional context, it is difficult to determine its intended use. Example: "The results are expected for first quarter analysis."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

This stronger impact of Microcystis strain identity is expected for first exposures of local grazer populations with novel types of defences.

Evolutionary Applications

It has thus been suggested that a relationship between intron size and divergence might only be expected for first introns [ 1].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Furthermore, although most hybrids are F1s, some later generation hybrids were identified in the hybrid zone indicative of at least some successful backcrossing; two individuals of the morphologically intermediate individuals showed admixture with much higher contribution from one of the two species than would be expected for first generation hybrids (P18 and P20, Fig.  3).

BMC Plant Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Thousands were expected for Fourth of July inner-tube rides down the Guadalupe.

The New York Times

This is why a positive influence of naturalisation on training participation is expected for first-generation immigrants.

IZA Journal of Migration

It is possible that this book is written at an academic level above what should be expected for second-year student comprehension.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

The genomic relationship coefficients obtained using all the markers for the pairs of individuals in Table  2 show values between 0.17 and 0.45, which are around the values expected for third and first degree relatives respectively, and are unlikely to arise between unrelated individuals.

BMC Genomics

As the longer read lengths expected for "third generation" sequencing platforms [ 115, 116] offer sequence reads capable of interrogating repetitive sequences, the resequencing of many human individuals will allow for a more detailed examination of how the sequence properties of microsatellites affect their variability in human populations.

BMC Genomics

To Craig Kincaid, though, the cheap seats had proved much better than expected for his first major league game.

The New York Times - Sports

Eighty port calls are already expected for the first year, by ships from Carnival, Celebrity Cruises, Holland America and Princess Cruises.

The New York Times - Travel

"They both seem more at ease than I would have expected, for the first debate," Mr. Montemayor said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing anticipated outcomes or events at the beginning of a process, use clearer and more precise phrasing, such as "anticipated for the initial phase" or "projected for the start".

Common error

Be specific when expressing expectations; the phrase "expected for first" is often unclear. Instead, clarify what is expected during the initial stage, specifying the subject or outcome.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "expected for first" functions as a prepositional phrase that attempts to specify a timeframe or condition for an expectation. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. The available examples from Ludwig demonstrate varied attempts to use the phrase in scientific and news contexts, but their limited number suggests it's not a standard construction.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "expected for first" is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. While attempts to use it appear in various contexts, including science and news media, its infrequent occurrence suggests it is not a standard or recommended construction. When expressing expectations related to an initial stage, it is better to use clearer and more precise phrasing such as "anticipated for the initial phase" or "projected for the start". This will enhance communication and avoid ambiguity. Overall, strive for precision when describing anticipated outcomes to maintain grammatical correctness and clarity in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

anticipated for the initial

Replaces "expected" with "anticipated" and "first" with "initial" maintaining a similar meaning.

projected for the first

Substitutes "expected" with "projected", focusing on forecasting or predicting an outcome.

predicted for the first

Uses "predicted" instead of "expected", emphasizing a forecast based on analysis.

anticipated initially

Combines "anticipated" with "initially", streamlining the phrase while retaining the core meaning.

expected at the beginning

Replaces "first" with "at the beginning", providing a more descriptive alternative.

anticipated to start

Focuses on the commencement aspect, using "start" instead of "first".

planned for the first

Replaces "expected" with "planned", suggesting a deliberate arrangement.

scheduled for the first

Uses "scheduled" to indicate a planned or timetabled event.

intended for the first

Replaces "expected" with "intended", emphasizing purpose or design.

estimated for the first

Uses "estimated" to suggest an approximate calculation or judgment.

FAQs

How can I use "expected for first" in a sentence correctly?

While not grammatically ideal, it can be used when specifying the expected outcome for an initial stage. Consider rephrasing for clarity, such as "Results are "anticipated for the first quarter"".

What's a better alternative to "expected for first"?

For clearer communication, alternatives include phrases like "projected for the beginning", "anticipated initially", or "expected in the initial stage".

How do I avoid ambiguity when using "expected for first"?

Specify what you are expecting and when. Instead of "expected for first", try "The initial results are "expected to show"..." to provide better context.

Is "expected for first" grammatically correct?

Grammatically, it's not ideal. Rephrasing as "expected at the start" or "anticipated for the first time" is more accurate and clearer.