Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
The BFPE is the partnership-related parallel version of the Bielefeld Client Expectations Questionnaire (BFKE) [ 5].
The Bielefeld Partnership Expectations Questionnaire (BFPE) is a tool to assess attachment in the romantic relationships of adults.
The expectations questionnaire was completed before the first RUG meeting and the evaluation questionnaire was completed online within 1 week of each RUG meeting.
The expectations questionnaire was completed by 11/12 922%) RUG members and the survey completed 61 times out of 65 potential completions (94%).
The Bielefeld Relationship Expectations Questionnaire ('Bielefelder Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftserwartung', BFPE) [ 2, 3], an additional German instrument for capturing attachment in romantic relationships, was developed for two reasons.
Whether or not the RUG members met their own expectations was assessed by comparing an expectations questionnaire with the evaluation questionnaire.
Similar(43)
Training credibility and participants' expectancy for improvement will be measured with the credibility and expectation questionnaire (CEQ).
The university-wide survey study, namely e-Station Learning Experience and Expectation Questionnaire was conducted to investigate college students' current e-Station classroom learning experiences and their expectations on future smart classroom (Chien and Chang 2010; Chien and Chang 2012).
Symptom management factors were measured using the Nijmegen Expectation Questionnaire (NEQ) and a series of management statements.
Attitudes towards the management of minor ailments were evaluated with the validated Nijmegen Expectation Questionnaire as part of the health interview [ 24].
The expectation questionnaire included seven questions relating to pain relief, range of motion, activities of daily living, work, sports or leisure activities, interacting and providing care for others and overall expectation for recovery following surgery.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com