Sentence examples for expectancy conditions from inspiring English sources

The pattern learning task elicited a FN component for both high and low win expectancy conditions, which was found to be independent of reward expectation and showed little relationship with task and personality variables.

Win and loss grand average waveforms were also constructed for the high win expectancy conditions.

The ERP was significantly different from zero in loss feedback processing in both the high and low expectancy conditions, although amplitudes were significantly higher for more unexpected losses.

The induction of varying expectancy, between high and low expectancy conditions, was based largely on presentation of the task as a simple executive function (memory of small sequences).

This suggests that the P3 amplitude differences for the central midline electrode showed little difference between high and low expectancy conditions for individuals with higher positive affect, higher drive to receive reward, and increased left cortical activity.

In addition, multiple linear regression models were computed for predicting individual differences in the P3 response amplitude differences between the high and low win expectancy conditions identified as significant in the earlier hypothesis testing (FZ, FCZ, and CZ electrodes).

In order to determine if an FN response was induced between positive and negative feedback, win and loss grand average waveforms were created for each expectancy condition.

When perceivers were distracted, their impressions of the target corresponded to the expectancy condition for both low and high NFC perceivers.

Only in the high expectancy condition, we found a decreased response time to both congruent and incongruent trials on the Stroop task performance after HF rTMS.

We also observed a P3 component, which showed sensitivity to outcome expectancy variation and relationships to measures of anxiety, appetitive motivation, and cortical asymmetry, although these varied by electrode location and expectancy condition.

In the high win expectancy condition, amplitude differences for the FZ electrode were significantly related to higher amounts of left cortical activity (F4 F3 electrode pair, r = .547, p = .019).019