Exact(6)
Since these factors are inherently present for all activities, we would expect the evolution of rank to have generic features across sports and games.
Secondly, we expect the evolution of mechanisms for DNA sharing and of defense mechanisms against DNA intrusion in genomes.
Consequently, one would not expect the evolution of plastic migration in a uniform and stable environment where the cost of dispersal is high, and sib competition is weak.
If natural selection favours different phenotypes under different environmental conditions, we expect the evolution of plastic phenotypic responses to information or cues that predict environmental change (Gotthard and Nylin 1995; Via et al. 1995; Pigliucci 1996).
Although these predictions may be overly simplistic, we nevertheless expect the evolution of reaction norms that allow individuals to adjust their mating behaviour to reflect the prevailing availability of mates [ 15, 20, 24].
Because colonization success is enhanced by larger relative brain size (in mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians: Amiel et al. 2011), we might expect the evolution of larger brain size during colonization of some but not all environments (e.g., smaller brains may be optimal in Australia, reflecting resource constraints: Amiel et al. 2011).
Similar(54)
As expected, the evolution of the kinematics and vortex shedding show a complex dependence on the flow parameters near the transition in the flow.
As we expected, the evolution rate obtained in these regions appeared to be sufficiently consistent to accurately discriminate closely related taxa.
Usually, for high temperatures one expects the evolution never to converge, since new mutations that maximizes B are often not accepted.
As expected, the evolution rate of the orthologs is different.
As expected, the evolution rates of Drosophila and Saccharomycetales families form approximately symmetrical bell-shaped distributions in the log scale (fig. 3), similar to the rate distributions in other lineages (Grishin et al. 2000; Wolf et al. 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com