Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
In claiming the attention of L for my utterance U, I'm implicitly vouching for the truth of whatever I can expect L to come up with if he processes U the way he'd process any promising stimulus and continues to do so until it yields a result that adequately repays his investment of effort to date.
Moreover, recalling that S is normalized in [0,1], we expect L ij ≈ 0 when d ij ≈ N, N being the number of features of the space S. The value N comes from the following inequality, which holds for any pair of samples s i, s j ∈ S (represented by their vector representation in terms of the given set of features r i,r j ): d ij = ∑ k = 1 N ( r i [ k ] − r j [ k ] ) 2 ≤ N (2).
We expect L to provide a good approximation of the full network, as genes further away will exert a diminishing influence on the inference of the FG.
Similar(57)
What can people expect tonight?
And what do you expect tonight?
So what can we expect tonight?
"Whatever you expect tonight, fuck it," he says.
I expect tonight [last night] will be a full night, with people working through the night".
"But it was really nice not knowing what to expect tonight".
To recycle some words from my preamble last year, a nation doesn't expect this afternoon.
Expect morning and afternoon menus from chef Jason Gehring at the Drive Thru.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com