exists of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "exists of" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically a misuse of the verb "exist," which does not pair with "of" in this context. Example: "The committee exists of several members" should be corrected to "The committee consists of several members."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No video exists of him performing.

The Economist

Or, if it exists, of its worth.

The Guardian - Books

But no record exists of Urban's intentions for the tower.

The New York Times

Bewilderingly, no video footage exists of this online.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

No evidence exists of widespread, suspicionless GPS monitoring".

The New York Times

He exists, of that there is no doubt.

Independent

What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction?

Independent

No official record exists of any direct reply to Mr. Popper.

The New York Times

The other day I went looking for what still exists of Chopin's trail.

The New York Times - Arts

But a model exists of progress in the most unpromising circumstances.

The Guardian

A 1947 record exists of Parker and Gillespie playing "Tiger Rag," the 1917 dixieland warhorse.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "exists of" in formal writing. Replace it with grammatically correct alternatives such as "consists of", "is composed of", or "comprises" to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Common error

Don't confuse "exists of" with phrases that describe composition. Instead of saying "The team exists of five members", use "The team consists of five members" to correctly indicate that the team is formed by those members.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "exists of" is generally used incorrectly as a prepositional phrase to indicate composition or constitution. However, standard English grammar dictates that the verb 'exist' does not take 'of' in this context. Ludwig AI highlights this error.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

30%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "exists of" appears frequently in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms this, recommending alternatives like "consists of", "is composed of", or "comprises" for accurate and clear communication. Although prevalent across news, science, and wiki sources, its use should be avoided in formal writing to maintain grammatical integrity. Remember to use established phrases to accurately describe what something is composed of.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consists of

Indicates the elements that make up a whole; suggests a structured composition.

is composed of

Highlights the act of being formed from specific components.

is made up of

Emphasizes the constitutive elements of something.

comprises

Implies the inclusion of all parts within a whole.

includes

Suggests that something is part of a larger set or group.

is comprised of

Another way to specify the parts included in a whole.

features

Points out notable aspects or characteristics.

exhibits

Draws attention to the display of particular qualities.

displays

Highlights the presentation of certain attributes.

is characterized by

Indicates the defining traits of something.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "exists of" in a sentence?

Replace "exists of" with a more grammatically correct alternative such as "consists of", "is composed of", or "comprises", depending on the intended meaning. For example, instead of "The book exists of ten chapters", say "The book consists of ten chapters".

What's the difference between "consists of" and "exists of"?

"Consists of" indicates that something is made up of specific parts. "Exists of" is grammatically incorrect and should not be used. Use "consists of" to accurately describe the composition of something, as in "The project "consists of" three phases".

Is it ever correct to use "exists of" in formal writing?

No, "exists of" is not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. Always opt for alternatives like "is composed of" or "comprises" to maintain clarity and correctness.

What are some alternatives to "exists of" that I can use in my writing?

Depending on the context, you can use ""consists of"", "is made up of", "includes", or "comprises" as alternatives to "exists of". Each alternative provides a slightly different nuance, so choose the one that best fits your intended meaning.